Correlation is Not Causation Electrical Analysis of St Jude Implant Shows Normal Pacing
St. Jude Merlin Error Indicators Are Not Evidence of Malfunction
![]() |
| Battle of the bands: Heres what we listened to while writing this summary. |
The Muddy Waters report of August 25 showed a screenshot which they say shows an �apparent malfunction.� They also say that red error marks �are also indicators that the device is malfunctioning.� We were curious about these claims and decided to see if we could produce the same onscreen displays without causing any malfunction. This summary shows the screenshot is correlated with normal pacing and sensing, suggesting that the Muddy Waters report misinterprets clinical relevance of the screenshot.

![]() |
| Figure 1: Our experiment shows that a Merlin programmer screenshot from p. 17 of the Muddy Waters report is not supportive evidence of a successful attack. The top photo shows our reproduction of the Merlin programmer screen photo, but without causing changes to the pacing pulses. Our end-to-end oscilloscope measurements (bottom photo) show that pacing pulses continue normally despite the three benign alerts that are expected when not connected to cardiac tissue. |
To reproduce the markers that the Muddy Waters report highlights as indicators of a successful attack, we introduced benign electrical noise on the sense/pace port via the clipped lead by connecting the lead to a separately grounded oscilloscope (i.e., not grounded to the �can� of the device, which typically acts as ground). This noise was sufficient to trigger the �VS2� markers on the programmer screen, indicating that the device sensed a �ventricular beat.� While sampling the 40 bpm pacing output as described above, we reproduced the count of three alerts visible in the Muddy Waters report�s screen photo: two alerts from high impedance on two leads (since those were not connected to cardiac tissue), and one indicating �ventricular noise reversion.� The pacing and sensing continued to function normally. ?

